Abstract
Considers the arguments of "orthodox" economists against trade unions and the broadest possible protection of workers from the perspective of a labour lawyer. Recognizing that the traditional forms of protection offered on the European continent are no longer functioning satisfactory, argues in favour of dialogue with economists on what new forms of protection might be better adapted to the current reality and, in particular, to the distinct interests of those with regular, protected jobs (insiders) and those without (outsiders). Concludes that a new balance needs to be struck between workers' protection in the employment relationship and in the labour market in general.